Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00005
Original file (PD2013 00005.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: xx         CASE: PD1300005
BRANCH OF SERVICE: NAVY  BOARD DATE: 20130717
SEPARATION DATE: 20020916


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty DK2/E-5 (Disbursing Clerk) medically separated for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). In 2000, the CI had onset of pain and numbness in his right hand. The symptoms worsened and soon he also complained of similar symptoms in his left hand. He was diagnosed with bilateral CTS, with the right wrist being worse than the left. In 2001 the CI had surgery performed on both wrists. Despite surgical intervention his CTS condition did not improve adequately to meet the physical requirements of his Rating or satisfy physical fitness standards. After two periods of limited duty (LIMDU) the case sent to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) that found the bilateral CTS to be medically unacceptable and as forwarded it to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The MEB also forwarded a right shoulder condition for PEB adjudication. The PEB found the bilateral CTS unfitting and rated each wrist at 10% for a 20% combined rating. The r ight shoulder condit ion w as found to be C ategory III (not separately unfitting and not contributing to the unfitting condition) . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “As per the Wounded Warrior Act of 2008, I wish to have my DoD disability rating reviewed to ensure its accuracy and fairness.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The ratings for the unfitting CTS conditions are addressed below. No other conditions are within the defined purview of the Board. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review remain eligible for consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.


RATING COMPARISON:

Service PEB – Dated 20020802
 VA - (3 mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Right Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
 5299-8715 10% Right Carpal Tunnel 8515 10% 20020628
Scar on Right Wrist 7804 10%
Left Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
 5299-8715 10% Left Carpal Tunnel 8515 10%
Scar on Left Wrist 7804 10%
Right Shoulder Impingement
 Category III Right Shoulder Impingement 5201 30%
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 15
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 80%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 21107



ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS). The CI developed symptoms of bilateral CTS on a gradual basis. In March 2001 he was placed on 8 months of LIMDU. In September 2001 his case was re-evaluated and the LIMDU was extended for another 8 months. The CI had bilateral carpal tunnel surgery with the right wrist surgery in May 2001, followed by left wrist surgery in October of that year. In spite of his surgery and other treatment the CTS symptoms persisted and another MEB was initiated. This MEB narrative summary was dated 24 April 2002. Physical examination (PE) on the left revealed positive Tinel’s and positive Phalen’s. Two-point discrimination (TPD) was around 7-8 mm. On the right, he had positive Tinel’s, positive Phalen’s, and TPD was 5-7 mm. There was no thenar atrophy of either hand.

On 28 June 2002 (11 weeks prior to separation) the CI had a VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam. The CI reported that he did not get dressed himself and that he required help with everything. In the exam room, however, he undressed without assistance. PE revealed positive Tinel’s and positive Phalen’s bilaterally. Neurological exam was normal. There was no muscle weakness or wasting. Peripheral exam showed no peripheral neuropathy, and he had normal grip. Wrist exam showed no weakness, incoordination, lack of endurance, or fatigue. Wrist range-of-motion was measured and is summarized below.
Wrist ROM
 VA C&P ~ 2½ mos. Pre-Sep
 (20020628)
Right Left
Dorsiflexion (70⁰ is normal)
 40⁰ 70⁰
Palmar Flexion (80⁰ is normal)
 40⁰ 70⁰
Ulnar Deviation (45⁰ is normal)
 45⁰ 45⁰
Radial Deviation (20⁰ is normal)
 20⁰ 20⁰
Comment
 (with pain) (with pain)
§4.71a Rating
 10%* 10%*
        *10% based on VASRD §4.40 (Functional loss), §4.45 (The joints), and §4.59 (Painful motion) invalid font number 31502

The Board carefully examined all evidentiary information available, and directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The Navy PEB and the VA chose different coding options for the CTS condition, but both assigned a disability rating of 10% to each side, for a combined CTS rating of 20%. After a thorough review of the treatment record, the Board determined that the CI’s left and right wrist conditions were essentially non-compensable based solely on the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.71a codes for loss of wrist motion (5214 & 5215). In accordance with VASRD §4.40, §4.45, and §4.59, however, a 10% rating is warranted when there is satisfactory evidence of functional limitation due to painful motion of a major joint. The Board tried to find a path to a rating higher than 10% using other codes applicable to the bilateral CTS condition. The other VASRD codes that were considered did not result in a higher rating, though, since the record did not show evidence of a significantly disabling abnormality justifying a higher rating.

The Board also considered the matter of peripheral neuropathy. At the June 2002 C&P exam, neurological exam was normal. There was no muscle weakness or wasting. Peripheral exam showed no peripheral neuropathy and the CI had a normal grip. After reviewing all the information in the treatment record, there was insufficient evidence of a clinically disabling neuropathy that interfered with satisfactory performance of military duties. Specifically, the CI’s neurological symptoms did not constitute a separately unfitting nerve condition at the time of separation from service. The Board therefore does not recommend a separate disability rating for peripheral neuropathy. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board found insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the bilateral CTS of the left and right wrists.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the right CTS and IAW VASRD §4.40, §4.45, §4.59, and §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the left CTS and IAW VASRD §4.40, §4.45, §4.59, and §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Right Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
 5299-8715 10%
Left Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
 5299-8715 10%
COMBINED (w/ BLF)
 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20121226, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





xx
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW
BOARDS

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) CORB ltr dtd 5 Nov 13

In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their respective forwarding memorandums, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individual’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board:
- former USMC
- former USN
- former USN
- former USN


                                                      xx
                                                     Assistant General Counsel
                                                      (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00178

    Original file (PD2013 00178.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was diagnosed with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and was noted to have normal X-rays. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01747

    Original file (PD2012 01747.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Wrist ROM In degrees (Normal)MEB/Occ Therapy ~7 Mo. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the left CTS condition, the Board recommends a...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02479

    Original file (PD-2013-02479.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditionwas submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB (IPEB)adjudicated “bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome”as unfitting, rated 10% and 10% for a combined 20% rating, citing application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Bilateral CTS .The first note in the service treatment record was an electrodiagnostic study dated 29 August 2003, which was performed for the CI’s history of bilateral hand pain, tingling and numbness without neck pain. At an orthopedic...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00641

    Original file (PD-2014-00641.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. She had what was diagnosed as right CTSmarked by pain and paresthesias with decreased manual dexterity along with problems of lifting and carrying, lack of stamina,and decreased strength.At the time of the VA examination, she was not employed.Temporally remote (more...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00124

    Original file (PD2010-00124.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (42A, Human Resources Specialist) medically separated for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) with median nerve neuropathies. The Board therefore has no reasonable basis for recommending any additional unfitting conditions for separation rating. In the matter of the bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome condition, the Board unanimously recommends that...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00323

    Original file (PD2012 00323.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the right CTS, and the chronic pain, neck and right kneeconditions as two unfitting conditions, rated 10% and 10%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD),and the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated with a 20% disability rating. Results of this EMG recorded mild bilateral CTS, chronic on left and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00028

    Original file (PD2009-00028.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical basis for the separation was bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and low back pain (LBP). Regarding the CTS, IAW VASRD §4.124a discussed above, a 10% rating for each wrist is indicated. A 20% rating, deferring to the very proximal VA rating was considered.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00999

    Original file (PD2010-00999.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI’s application asserts that compensable ratings should be considered for migraine headaches. In the matter of the migraine headache condition, the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend a finding of unfit for additional rating at separation. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00374

    Original file (PD2010-00374.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the right and left wrist carpal tunnel syndrome condition as unfitting, rated 10% each, with a combined disability rating of 20%. In the matter of ulnar neuropathy or any other medical conditions eligible for Board consideration, the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend any findings of unfit for additional rating at separation. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01581

    Original file (PD2012 01581.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left leg, lower backand right wristconditions, characterized as “ fibrous dysplasia of the left proximal tibia, Status Post (S/P) excision and biopsy of the tumor mass,” “ back pain, pain is mild to moderate intensity,increased with activities, and occasional frequency” and “ right wrist pain, possible carpal tunnel syndrome” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “ chronic pain to include...